Which of the following is NOT a valid way to satisfy the summary judgment burden?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Bar Exam with our Mnemonics Test. Boost your memory and understanding using flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with detailed hints and explanations. Get ready to ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is NOT a valid way to satisfy the summary judgment burden?

Explanation:
In summary judgment practice, the burden is met by evidence that would be admissible at trial and shows there is no genuine dispute of a material fact. You can support a motion with sworn statements from people with personal knowledge, with relevant documents, and with discovery materials if they would be admissible evidence at trial. What cannot satisfy the burden is oral testimony that isn’t supported by a sworn, admissible form like an affidavit or declaration. That kind of unsworn, unsubstantiated statement doesn’t carry the weight needed to prove there are no factual disputes, so it cannot satisfy the summary judgment standard.

In summary judgment practice, the burden is met by evidence that would be admissible at trial and shows there is no genuine dispute of a material fact. You can support a motion with sworn statements from people with personal knowledge, with relevant documents, and with discovery materials if they would be admissible evidence at trial. What cannot satisfy the burden is oral testimony that isn’t supported by a sworn, admissible form like an affidavit or declaration. That kind of unsworn, unsubstantiated statement doesn’t carry the weight needed to prove there are no factual disputes, so it cannot satisfy the summary judgment standard.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy