Bar Exam Mnemonics Practice Test

Session length

1 / 20

Which statement is true about impossibility as a defense to conspiracy under NY law?

Factual impossibility is never a defense

Impossibility defenses don’t defeat conspiracy liability because the offense centers on the plan and the steps taken toward carrying it out, not on whether the crime could actually be completed. If two or more people agree to commit a crime and take an overt step to further that plan, they can be guilty of conspiracy even if, for some factual reason, the crime could not be finished. That’s why factual impossibility is not a defense.

So the true statement is that factual impossibility is never a defense to conspiracy. The other choices mix in defenses that aren’t recognized in this context, or assert combinations that don’t fit how conspiracy liability is treated.

Legal impossibility is a defense in NY

Both are defenses

Neither is addressed

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy