In torts, which phrase best captures the idea that liability can be imposed without proof of fault for certain activities?

• A. Duty
• B. Breach
• C. Strict Liability
• D. Damages

Answer: (C)

The main idea is liability without proof of fault for certain activities, which is the essence of strict liability. In tort law, most claims require showing that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached it, and that breach caused damages. But for abnormally dangerous activities or certain product liability scenarios, the law imposes liability even if the defendant exercised all possible care. The plaintiff need only prove that the activity or product caused the injury; the defendant’s fault or negligence isn’t required. This is why this phrase best captures the concept.

The other terms describe parts of negligence analysis—duty is the obligation of care, breach is failing to meet that duty, and damages are the resulting harm. They don’t convey the idea of liability without fault.