In tolling when the defendant is absent from New York when the cause of action accrues, which statement about tolling is correct?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Bar Exam with our Mnemonics Test. Boost your memory and understanding using flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with detailed hints and explanations. Get ready to ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

In tolling when the defendant is absent from New York when the cause of action accrues, which statement about tolling is correct?

Explanation:
When a defendant is outside New York when the cause of action accrues, the clock for the statute of limitations is paused because you can’t complete in-state service while they’re away. The tolling continues until the defendant returns to New York, at which point service can be effected and the limitations period resumes. This approach prevents penalizing a plaintiff for the defendant’s absence and ensures the defendant has a realistic opportunity to defend. So the tolling ends when the defendant comes to New York.

When a defendant is outside New York when the cause of action accrues, the clock for the statute of limitations is paused because you can’t complete in-state service while they’re away. The tolling continues until the defendant returns to New York, at which point service can be effected and the limitations period resumes. This approach prevents penalizing a plaintiff for the defendant’s absence and ensures the defendant has a realistic opportunity to defend. So the tolling ends when the defendant comes to New York.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy